remedies, on their availability and effectiveness. By failing to do so, it took the risk of making a decision on a fragile basis. 18, As far as we are concerned, the Applicant may be considered as haying exhausted local remedies, as recognized by the Respondent State itself, and as noted by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights; consequently, we are of the opinion that the application is admissible. 19. Had the opportunity Court reached to examine the same conclusion, the merits of the matter it would and have to make had a decision alleged violations which fall within its jurisdiction, and to settle the matter, the in present situation, our opinion, the judgment of the Court Judge Gérard NIYUNGEKO a ae Judge El Hadji GUISSE Robert ENO: Registrar on In leaves regrettably, the impression of an uncompleted process. oS the