Government is inconsistent with Articles 6(d), 7(2) and 8(1)(c) of the Treaty; and  Finally, the Applicant has sought the declaratory Orders as set out in the Amended Reference. E. THE RESPONDENT’S CASE 11. The Respondent’s case is contained in his Response to the Amended Reference filed on 7th February, 2014 supported by the Affidavit sworn by one, Richard Kiggundu, Finance Manager of the QCIL on 11th July, 2014 and the Affidavit dated 29th July, 2014 sworn by one Ms. Jane Aceng, the Director General of Health Services in the Ministry of Health, in the Republic of Uganda and mainly in his written submissions filed on 23rd December, 2014. 12. In a nutshell, his case is as follows: A MoU and a Guarantee between the Government of Uganda and QCIL Ltd was signed on 14th December, 2005 and amended on 16th April, 2012;  The Applicant indeed made a disclosure of alleged malpractices that occurred between the National Medical Stores and QCIL Ltd;  The IGG carried out investigations and produced a report on 20th December 2011;  In the follow-up of the recommendations made by the Inspectorate of Government Unit, the IGG sought an update on the implementation of the recommendations and the Attorney General of Uganda on 12th April, 2012 and 27th May, 2013 Reference No. 5 of 2013 Page 7

Select target paragraph3