THE RESPONDENT’S SUBMISSIONS 55. The Respondent on his part submitted that both the IGG and the Attorney General of Uganda acted within their respective constitutional and statutory mandates. 56. He further argued that the IGG derives powers from the Constitution and the Laws of Uganda and pointed out that more specifically, Section 14(5) and (6) of the IGG Act provides that:“5. The Inspectorate shall have powers to investigate, cause investigation, arrest, cause arrest, prosecute or cause prosecution in respect of cases involving corruption, abuse of Authority or public office. 6. The Inspector General, may during the cause of his or her duties or as a consequence of his or her findings, make such orders and give such directions as are necessary and appropriate in the circumstances.” 57. In respect of the 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, the Respondent stated that Article 230(1) & (2) reads:“1.The Inspector General of Government shall have power to investigate, cause investigation, arrest, cause arrest, prosecute or cause prosecution in respect of cases involving corruption, , abuse of authority or of public office. 2. The Inspector General of Government may, during the course of his or her duties or as a consequence of his or her findings, make such orders and give such directions as are necessary and appropriate in the circumstances.” Reference No. 5 of 2013 Page 22