any, within thirty (30) days from receipt thereof, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 66(3) of the Rules. 4. On 28 March 2017, Mr. Mohamed Abubakari filed his observations, after the expiry of the 30 days deadline, and prayed the Court to accept the said observations. 5. On 2 April 2017, the Court examined the Applicant's request and decided to grant the same in the interest of justice. 6. By notice dated 11 April 2017, the Parties were notified of the Court's decision to close the written procedure. The Court did not deem it necessary to hold a public hearing. II. THE REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION 7. As indicated above, the instant Application for interpretation concerns the Judgment rendered by the Court on 3 June 2016 in the Matter of Mohamed Abubakari v. The United Republic of Tanzania (Application 007/2013), the relevant paragraphs of which are worded as follows in the operative provisions: "For these reasons, the Court, Unanimously, ( ... ) ix) Rules that the Respondent State has violated Article 7 of the Charter and Article 14 of the Covenant as regards the Applicant's rights to defend himself and have the benefit of a Counsel at the time of his arrest; to obtain free legal assistance during the judicial proceedings; to be promptly given the documents in the records to enable him defend himself; his defense based on the fact that the Prosecutor before the District Court had a conflict of interest with the victim of the armed robbery, to be considered by the Judge; not to be convicted solely on the basis of the inconsistent testimony of a single witness in the absence of any identification