facts to substantiate the objection application and the introduction the Comptroller the warrant procedure apart from the lateness of the of the Holding Charge and the notice to of Prison, Kiri-kiri Maximum Prison, Lagos to produce of detention. In view of Article 87 (5) of the Rules of of this Court, the Court made an order that decision is reserved for the final judgment. 7. The question documentary is: Is it appropriate evidence substantiating to allow a motion introducing the main application after the parties have closed their arguments and adjourned for judgment? 8. It is trite that pleadings may be amended which introduced which are not in dispute at any stage before judgment material fact is pronounced. What this motion sought to do is akin to the statement stated above that pleadings may be amended before judgment. and documents not in dispute introduced This COUlt grants the reliefs sought and state herein that the matters introducing the motion shall be considered in this suit to determine whether the detention of the applicant in this case in Kirikiri Maximum Prison from 2003 to date without trial amounts to a violation of human rights of the applicant. LEGAlJ ARGUMENTS 9. Learned Counsel BY THE PARTIES to the Applicant submitted applicant was violated by his continuous that the right of the detention for nine (9) years without trial. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff/applicant submitted that the right of the Plaintiff was violated upon as stated in the application and further contended that the detention in tl.e manner described in the application Vias contrary to Article 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 26 of the African Charter on Human and People's Rights and Articles 2(3) sub (1) and (2) 4