6:3. Consequently, the COurt holds that there was violation of the human rights of the Plaintiff/Applicant by the defendant and therefore it is adjudged accordingly to the specification below: From 2003 ------- 2004 N300, 000 From 2004 ------~ 2005 N300, 000 From :2005 ------- 2006 N300, 000 From 2006 ------- 2007 N300,OOO From 2007 ------- 2008 N300,00O From 2008 ------- 2009 N300, 000 From 2009 ------- 2010 N300, 000 From 2010 ------- 2011 N30o,000 From 20n ------- 2012 N300, 000, Computing the amount for each year and the number of years will bring to a total of the damages to the sum of 64. NZ.700 000. DECISION 1. Whereas the plaintiff alleged that his human rights was violated by the defendants holding maximum charge without in that he was charged on a trial prison from 16 and May,2003 remanded to 2012, in Kirikiri a period of nine years awaiting trial; 2. Whereas the defendants by their statement of defence denied that the plaintiff is in kirikiri prison since no warrant of detention showed that 11a.1; been produced he was ordered and the, l'iiding in prison .-custody ('krge by a competent court-the Yaba Magistrate Court Lagos; 3. Whereas the defence raised by the defendant were examined and found not to be credible and jettisoned by the 23