The Applicant further alleges that he initially filed administrative appeals before the competent authority of RECO the Ministry Republic. of Public Service & RWASCO, and Labour the Public Service Commission, as well as the Presidency of the Dissatisfied with the decisions arising from his appeals, he lodged an application for annulment of the termination decision Considering the Applicant as a civil servant, the High termination was not in accordance with the applicable before the High Court declared Court. that the law due to the lack of notification to the Applicant of the reasons for his dismissal. Dissatisfied with the damages EWSA awarded, the Applicant lodged an appeal before the Supreme Court. also filed an appeal with the same court. By Judgment RADA 0015/13/CS of8 November 2013, the Supreme Court found that the Applicant was not a civil servant but rather an employee under contract pursuant to Law No. 13/2009 of 27 May 2009 which regulates labour matters in Rwanda. It however, upheld the High Court's decision to award damages to the Applicant due to the fact that the latter had not been heard prior to the termination of the employment contract. Aggrieved by the decision, the Applicant lodged an appeal before the Supreme Court for review of its Judgment. By Judgment of 27 January 2017, that Court dismissed the application for review. Alleged violations The Applicant alleges that the termination of his appointment is illegal unconstitutional. He submits that by failing to resolve his problem to date and lacking and for fairness, independence and impartiality, the Respondent State violated his rights as expressed hereunder: i. the right to have one's cause heard under Article 7(1) of the Charter and Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human to as "the UDHR"); Rights (hereinafter referred