D. Alleged violation of Article 1 of the Charter 104. The Applicant submits, in general terms, that the Respondent State violated Article 1 of the Charter on freedoms enshrined the obligation to recognize in the Charter and the rights, duties and undertake to adopt legislative or other measures to give effect to them. RK 105. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 1 of the Charter, “The Member States of the Organisation of African freedoms in the Charter and shall undertake enshrined Unity ... shall recognize the rights, duties and to adopt legislative or other measures to give effect to them.” 106. In reference to its established jurisprudence, the Court reiterates that: when (the Court) finds that any of the rights, duties or freedoms set out in the Charter are curtailed, violated or not being achieved, means that the obligation set out under Article this necessarily 1 of the Charter has not been complied with and has been violated.4® 107. Given that none of the violations alleged by the Applicant has been proven in the instant case, the Court finds that there has been no violation of Article 1 of the Charter. IX. REPARATIONS 108. Article 27(1) of the Protocol states that: See Alex Thomas v. United Republic Others v. Burkina Faso (Merits) (2014) Others v. United Republic of Tanzania, Kocha) v. United Republic of Tanzania, of 1 § § Tanzania (Merits), § 135; See also Norbert Zongo and AfCLR 226, § 199 ; See also Kennedy Owino Onyanchi and 159; Nguza Viking (Babu Seya) and Johnson Nguza (Papi 135. 27