Commission reiterated the request for provisional measures in relation to the remaining Victims. 25. By letter dated 22 May 2018, the Complainant proffered additional submissions in relation to its locus standi, as requested by the Commission. 26. By letter and Note Verbale of 07 June 2018 the Secretariat acknowledged receipt of the submissions of 30 January and 2018 May 22 and 2018 forwarded the same to the Respondent State, requesting the State to submit on admissibility within two (2) months. 27. The Respondent State on 20 June 2018 indicated thaf the Commission had not addressed its previous concerns in relation to the Complainant's locus standi, and reiterating these concerns. The Secretariat acknowledged receipt on 31 August 2018. 28. By letter and Note Verbale of i6 November 2018, the Commission informed the Parties that the Respondent State had been granted an addition thirty (30) da,rs within which to submit on admissibility, and had been advised that its challenges in relation to the Complainant's locus standi is best addressed within the context of the said submissions. 29. By Note Verbale of 19 December 2018, the Respondent State replied, again initial concerns in relation to the locus stnndi of the Complainant concerns " . . . leave no doubt about the failure of compliance of the the ACHPR Rules of Procedure, Government of the related to the Communication 30. By letter and Note Arab and hence, Republic Verbale of Egypt during its 25th 31. During and 1h its 26 decided African of 08 March 2019, the State's initial with to indicate that the further Parties were informed Note Verbale of 19 of the Communication, based on the Extraordinary wishes and decided to proceed to make dealings that it would consider the matter of locus standi under that December the 2018 a determination on information before Session the Commission considered the it. Communication Article 56 (1) of the Charter, and not as a preliminary issue. ,.,, ,,,,,,..,., '� Admissibility The Embassy its its at hand for the above mentioned reasons." Extraordinary Session Admissibility the that Communication refuses to engage in any Commission had considered the Respondent the avowing reiterating Complainant's � --;, � Submissions on Admissibili l t \;i ;J • {j � "'"� % '; ' ;-) 8 " ' ':!; � "' o Au-u,. 'J(! J cy' 11>,.'t"'"ll1C11111r-o¢ ,,,..,,fl :, Uf ET Ot��$':::' 6