when he came to know of this evidence. must be submitted within six (6) months Further, the application for review of the time when the applicant obtained such evidence.* 29. The Court will examine the requirements of Article 28(3) of the Protocol and Rule 67(1) of the Rules in tandem, beginning with the issue of the time limit. 30. As regards the filing of the Application within six (6) months of the discovery of new evidence; the Court notes that the Applicant alleges that he discovered the evidence on or about 9 January 2020. The Court further notes that the Application was filed on 4 March 2020; that is one (1) month and twenty-four (24) days after the discovery of alleged new evidence. 31. Therefore, the Court concludes that the Application has been filed within the stipulated time and in accordance with Rule 67(1) of the Rules. 32. As regards the condition of the discovery of new evidence, the Court notes that this Application Judgment of 28 June consideration to the for Review 2019. is submitted in In the circumstances, supporting documents respect of the initial the Court will limit its that accompanied the Application which would allegedly prove the violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Charter. 33. The Court observes that the supporting documents filed, include, an agreement between the Respondent State and the Shanghai Construction 3 Thobias Mang’ara and Shukrani Mango v United Republic of Tanzania, AfCHPR, Application No. 002/2018, Judgment of 4 July 2019 (Review), § 14. Chrystanthe Rutabingwa v Republic of Rwanda, AfCHPR, Application No. 001/2018, Judgment of4 July 2019 (Review), § 14. 8