Respondent State’s Supplemental Arguments were duly transmitted to the Complainant. 29. On 23 August 2012 the Secretariat received from the Complainant a Response to the States Arguments on Admissibility together with three new declarations of Ms Cori Crider, Mr John Sifton and Ms Clara Gutteridge. 30. By Note Verbale of 30 August 2012 referenced ACHPR/COMM/DJI/383/10/814/12 to the Respondent State, the Secretariat acknowledged receipt of the former’s Supplemental Arguments and also transmitted the Complainant’s Response to the State’s Arguments on Admissibility with a request that the Respondent State should submit its written observations thereon before 1 October 2012. 31. By letter dated 30 August 2012 and referenced ACHPR/COMM/383/10/DJI/813/12 the Secretariat also acknowledged receipt of the Complainants Response to the State’s Arguments on Admissibility. By the same letter the Secretariat transmitted the Respondent State’s Supplemental Arguments on Admissibility to the Complainant with a request that the latter should submit his observations thereon before 1 October 2012. 32. On 21 September 2012 the Secretariat received a letter dated 17 September 2012 from the Respondent State requesting for 30 days extension of time within which to submit its written observations on the Complainant’s Response to the Respondent State’s Arguments on Admissibility, citing the bulky extra declarations and attachments submitted in support of the Complainant’s Response, the Response itself, and the fact that the Complainant had had approximately 5 months to submit its Response in excess of the requirement of Rule 105(3) of the Rules of Procedure. 33. In terms of Rule 113(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Commission acceded to the request and granted the Respondent State a further 30 days ending 1 November 2012 for the submission of observations on the Complainant’s Response. The Secretariat communicated this decision to the Respondent State by Note Verbale dated 26 September 2012 referenced: ACHPR/COMM/DJI/383/10/882/12. 34. On 30 September 2012 the Secretariat received the Complainant’s Response to the Supplemental Arguments on Admissibility submitted by the Republic of Djibouti. The Response to Supplemental Arguments was duly transmitted to the Respondent State by Note Verbale dated 4 October 2012 and referenced: ACHPR/COMM/DJI/383/10/910/12. 6