104. Summerset and the State of Niger used legal remedies (recourse to the courts, authorization to fell trees) to evict them. 105. The compensation claim remained unfounded and was rejected. 106. The Court cannot review its decision at this point. c. On the origin of TP No. 25096 of Mr. Mainassara and No. 30637 of Summerset 107. The Applicants try to make believe that Mr. Mainassara Amadou, who had land adjacent to the land of Gountou Yéna, would have received "preferential and discriminatory treatment"; 108. That the parties also debated, once again, on this point and the Court ruled in this regard, which cannot be the object of Revision of the Decision rendered; 109. In the instant case, the Applicants allege that they were discriminated against based on their economic position. 110. Further, in an attempt to mislead this Court, they wrongly maintain that they were the only ones to have been dispossessed of their land and that other persons, who acquired portions of land from the people of Gountou Yenna, were not affected. 20

Select target paragraph3