Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Communication 758/21 – Queen Ntombikayise Ambe (Represented by Shadrack Tebeile) v Republic of South Africa

ACHPR Decision

Type of Document

Keywords

Case Head Notes: The Commission ruled the Communication inadmissible because it did not comply with 56(5) and (6). Regarding 56(5), the Commission stated that the merits of the Complainant's domestic case were still pending before the High Court of the Respondent State. The matter, pertaining to the Complainant, that went up to the Constitutional Court was on an application to appeal the decision by the High Court. The Commission stated that the Complainant should allow the Courts in the Respondent State to hear the matter on its merits, by going back to the High Court, where the main review application is still pending for hearing. Regarding 56(6), the Commission stated that, if 56(5) is not fulfilled, it will also be concluded that 56(6) has not been complied with.

Country

Duration of Procedure

Country Geolocation

Latitude: -30.559482

Longitude: 22.937506

Queen Ntombikayise Ambe (Represented by Shadrack Tebeile) v South Africa.pdf
English
ML TOC
Download View