24. The Federal Attorney attached to his requisition for waiver of parliamentary immunity a USB key, which was supposed to contain the evidence for his allegations; 25. Mr. KODJO Messan Agbéyomé did not have the opportunity to have access to the contents of the said USB key, neither at the time of the notification by the bailiff of the letter inviting him to appear before the special committee of the National Assembly, nor at the time of his appearance before the committee; 26. The parliament member who represented Mr. KODJO before the committee made such request in vain during his hearing; 27. That the USB key containing the documents attached in support of the Prosecutor’s requisition determined the findings of the special committee which were submitted to the plenary on the occasion of the vote to lift the Applicant’s parliamentary immunity; 28. In a correspondence dated March 11, 2020 addressed to the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Applicant already denounced the hasty invitation received the day before, on March 10, 2020, at 6:30 p.m., to appear before the special committee for the waiver of parliamentary immunity, which did not give him any reasonable time to prepare properly his defense; (Exhibit No. 12 - Correspondence from the Applicant to the Speaker of the National Assembly). 29. Pursuant to his affidavit dated April 28, 2020, Mr. KPEEVEY GabyGadzo, a member of the Togolese National Assembly, who represented the Applicant before the special committee, as authorized by the Rules of Procedure of the said Assembly, explains how, on March 11, 2020, when he arrived before the special committee, his wish to have the assistance of a lawyer was denied since the lawyer accompanying him was prohibited from 8