B. Other admissibility requirements 40. The Court recalls that the admissibility requirements for an Application are cumulative, so that if any one of them is not met, the entire Application becomes inadmissible.12 41. The Court observes that having held that local remedies were not exhausted, there is no need to rule on the other admissibility requirements. 42. Accordingly, the Court finds that the present Application does not meet the admissibility requirements set out in Article 56 of the Charter and declares it inadmissible. VII. COSTS 43. The Parties did not submit on costs. *** 44. The Court recalls that under Rule 32(2) of its Rules, “Unless otherwise decided by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs, if any”. 45. The Court considers in the present case that there is no reason to depart from this principle. Accordingly, it orders that each Party should bear its own costs. Aminata Soumaré v. Republic of Mali, ACtHPR, Application No. 038/2019, Judgment of 5 September 2023 (jurisdiction and admissibility), § 47; Yacouba Traoré v. Republic of Mali, ACtHPR, Application No. 002/2019, Judgment of 22 September 2022 (jurisdiction and admissibility), § 49; Mariam Kouma and Ousmane Diabaté v. Republic of Mali (merits) (21 March 2018) 2 AfCLR 237, § 63; Rutabingwa Chrysanthe v. Republic of Rwanda (jurisdiction and admissibility) (11 May 2018) 2 AfCLR 361, § 48. 12 12