GIULIANI AND GAGGIO v. ITALY JUDGMENT 89 weapons issued to the law-enforcement agencies at the G8 summit in Genoa; 3. Holds, by ten votes to seven, that there has been no violation of Article 2 of the Convention in its substantive aspect as regards the organisation and planning of the policing operations during the G8 summit in Genoa; 4. Holds, by ten votes to seven, that there has been no violation of Article 2 of the Convention in its procedural aspect; 5. Holds, unanimously, that it is not necessary to examine the case under Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention; 6. Holds, by thirteen votes to four, that there has been no violation of Article 13 of the Convention; 7. Holds, unanimously, that there has been no violation of Article 38 of the Convention. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 24 March 2011. Vincent Berger Jurisconsult Jean-Paul Costa President In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this judgment: (a) Joint partly dissenting opinion of Judges Rozakis, Tulkens, Zupančič, Gyulumyan, Ziemele, Kalaydjieva and Karakaş; (b) Joint partly dissenting opinion of Judges Tulkens, Zupančič, Gyulumyan and Karakaş; (c) Joint partly dissenting opinion of Judges Tulkens, Zupančič, Ziemele and Kalaydjieva. J.-P.C. V.B.