(iii) Rule that the Court has no jurisdiction to issue an order compelling the Respondent State to release the Applicant from detention". 21.On the merits of the case, the Respondent prays the Court to: '(i) Rule that the Govemment of thre United Republic of Tanzania has not violatedArticles 1,2,3,4, 5,6,7:1 c)and7.2 of the Charter; (ii) Rule that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not breachArticle 13. b) and c) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania; (iii) Rule that the conviction and sentence imposed on the Applicant by the Trial Court, the High Court and the Court of Appeal of Tanzania were proper and not excessive; (iv) Rule that the thirty (30) year prison sentence for the sffence of armed robbery is lavrrful; (v) Rute that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania did not discriminate against the Applican( (vi) Deelare that the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania should not pay reparations to the Applicant; (vii V, ) Dismiss the Application in its entirety for lack of merit" PRELIMINARY OB.IEGTIONS BAISED BY THE RESPONDENT 22.1n its Response to the Application, the Respondent raised preliminary objections on both the jurisdiction of the Court and the admissibility of the Application. F I .l:-.- 7 r