mn33#'. IV. PRAYERS OF THE PARTIES 2l.Although the First Applicant and the Seventh Applicant have an additional claim which is distinct from the allegations that all the Applicants have jointly made, the Applicants have not desegregated their prayers and they have jointly prayed the Court for the following: An order that the application is admissible; il An order declaring that their basic rights have been violated through the unconstitutional acts of the Respondent State; llt An order that they "regain and enjoy" their fundamental rights in respect of the violations perpetrated by the Respondent State; tv An order that the Respondent State recognise the rights and duties enshrined in the Charter and take legislative and other measures to give effect to them; V An order nullifying the Respondent State's decisions violating the Applicants rights and ordering their release from custody; VI vil An order for reparations; Any other order(s)/relief(s)/remedies as the Court may be pleased to grant and as seems just in the circumstances of the case 22.|n respect of the jurisdiction and admissibility of the Application, the Respondent State prays the Court to grant the following orders,: "i. That, the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights is not vested with jurisdiction to adjud icate over this matter n b 7