56.The court furrher nnr^^ Appricant 000&t1si r, ,rff:J1""1,':::::LIe Appeal which "' 1l* Firsr Appricant and the sevenrh dismis""o".""""-1,"1"_"0 sentences to the court of o, * .f ,h e r "o,* lir: ::::: :"til ", "as enmeshed in the"bundre "*,,, or" to the AppliJ of rights j# #,,;:H:: have pronoun"" of Appear,,n",..T itself on i t';';; ;;#;;: IilH:::'fi:' ;*l which is the hrghr had rhe "or"r,r,1:t"l ,esaty**"oJll"",;;,ffi ;Jl,il,',r; j:b'ff;;:#:,n: 57. Secondly, the Co o ];Jt"Til not exhaust J#ff #iTil;:i' ertraoroi;;; " is an oorrlapproaching ftre hords that tne rirsie re ite ra :"."' framed corremedy tes its pos itio n rh at in the Respondent that an applicant need acons,i,u,ion",,";*m,:**]:],m:tii:.":Tl;I"',",:J 58. The Court, thereforr x,;*:l l;##ril ffir"":i, #;r :H::; n rs, therefore, dismissed. 59. The Court, having declared inadmissible Applicants and having and the I joint alresations by a, rhe by *re rirst eppri",,t ;,;;;::]li'".1n" seventh;#;#T:T:,1:#ation rrvw "r" allegation. VII. MERITS 60. The First Appticar fundamentar and the seven th Appticant submit rightsunder Artic,e that their 13(6 Xc) of the Respondent State,s 6 Application I anzania. Ea uganyi lrroceed to examine the merits of this anii #;!:, n tryllJ:f* 7i!:,!I:: Y18 :, :H:;,:t .,3;21;,i,.;il:";"i:,tri,#yi:X;: