c00892 however further held that non-repetition would be relevant in individual cases where the violation will not cease or is likely to occur again.3s 147. ln the instant case, the Court is of the view that non-repetition is not warranted in the circumstances given that the Applicant and his family are no longer living in the territory of the Respondent State and the orders sought do not include their return. As such, the likelihood of a fresh deportation and repetition of the violations found in this judgment is non-existent. '148. Having said that, the court notes that, in its Response to the Application, the Respondent state submits that "... cavity searches are security measures performed upon entry and exit of most prisons in the Respondent state.,,36 ln light of that submission, the Court considers that the violation found with respect to the Applicant has the potential for wider or structural violations, and therefore holds that an order for non-repetition is warranted in this respect. 149. As a consequence, the Court orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures to ensure that anal search as in the instant case and its kind, are conducted in strict compliance with its international obligations and principles earlier set out in the findings of the Court on the violation of the right to dignity. iii. Publication of the Judgment 150' The Applicant prays the Court to order that the Respondent State should publish in the national Gazette the decision on the merit of the main application within one (1) month of the delivery of judgment as a measure of satisfaction. He further prays the Court to order that: The official English summary developed by the Registry of the court, of this judgment, which must be translated to Kiswahili at the expense of the Respondent State and published in both languages, once in 35 Armand Guehi v. Tanzania (Merits and Reparati ons), $ 191 ; and Reverend Chistopher R. Mtikita v. Tanzania (Reparations), g 43. ss'Reply to the Application by ent' da ted 3 September 2015 and received at the Registry of the Court on g September 36 \-h.'r.-^[