0d0900 lil Burundian Franc Eighty Miilion (FBU gO,OOO,OOO) being a compensation for damage suffered by his family following arbitrary and unjust prosecution especially in Criminal Case No. 765/2006. 114. The Applicant, in subsequent submissions on reparations, prays the court to grant him the following: i. The amount of ii. The amount of US Dollars Fifteen Thousand ($15,000) for morat iii. prejudice suffered by his family members as indirect victims; The amount of US Doltars Twenty-Two Thousand ($ 2O,OOO) iv. v. vi. us Dollars Twenty Thousand ($20,000) for moral prejudice suffered as a direct victim; [sic]for legal fees incurred in the proceedings before this Court; The amount of US Dollars Five Hundred ($ soo) for other expenses; An order that the Respondent state guarantees non-repetition of the violations and reports back to the Court every six months; and An order that the Respondent state publishes the judgment in the national Gazette within one month of its delivery as a measure of satisfaction. 115. The Respondent state, in its Response to the Application, prays the court to dismiss the Application and rule that the Applicant is not entiled to reparations. The Respondent state did not respond to the the Appticant,s additionat submissions on reparations. *** 116. ln line with its case-law, the Court considers that for reparations to be awarded, the Respondent State should be internationally responsible, there should be a nexus between the wrongful act and the harm, and where it is granted, reparation should coverthe full damage suffered. Furthermore, theApplicant bears the onus to justify the claims made.21 21 See Application No. 001 /2015. Judgment of 0711212018 (Merits and Reparations), Armand Guehi v. United Republic of Tanzan E blic of d' lvoire lntervening) (hereinafter refened to as,,Armand Guehi v. Tanzania (Merifs s)'), $ 157. See also, Apptication No. 013/201 1. Judgment 28 H-