00031 0 12.Furthermore, in our view, the Court's reasoning should not have been predicated on speculation as to the potential impact of the letter on the Applicants' conviction, had it been available at the time of their trial and appellate proceedings. What is more relevant and which the majority should have relied on, rather, is the fact that there is nothing on record to show that the letter was presented and considered by the domestic courts although it was in the possession of the Applicants at the time of the Application for review of the Court of Appeal's decision. 13. ln spite of the fact that the Court has not urged the Respondent State to ensure that investigations initiated by CHRGG are concluded and necessary action taken as may be necessary, we express the hope that the State will still do so o in exercise of its international responsibility and the duty it owes to its citizens., Done at Tunis, this 7th of December in the year Two Thousand and Eighteen in English and French, the English text being authoritative. Justice Ben KIOKO-Vice President -7trr^.a.-' Justice Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA o o 4 q