people, all those who opposed the coup were arrested, detained and punished for exercising their rights, and harsh sentences including mass death penalties were passed on dissidents. The Complainant however noted that former President Mubarak was released and cleared of any charges. 14. In view of the foregoing, the Complainant submits that under the current regime, exhaustion of domestic remedies is impossible, as the military is ruling the country, and that any judge who shows any independence from the military would be punished by being sacked or removed. Lawyers and attorneys are also not left out of such punishments as the judic Egypt has collapsed by subduing itself to the military rules ntences have become politicized’. 15. In view of the foregoing, the Com ple the Authorities against the Vi discriminatory segregation; (i torturing of detainees; (iv) , committed by @ following: (i) ‘ople; “(ii) crime of the course of trial int on 15 December 2015 and acknowledged seized of the Commission, mission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Commission) was ommunication during the 19th Extra-Ordinary Session of the from 16 to 25 February 2016. 19. By letter and note verbale dated 07 March 2016 the Complainant and the Respondent State were informed of the decision to be seized and the Complainant was requested to present evidence and arguments on admissibility within two (2) months. 20. By letter and note verbale dated 04 May 2016 the Complainant and the Respondent State were informed that the Communication was deferred during