000866 97.1n the instant case, the Court established that the Respondent State has violated the Applicants' right to a fair trial relating to their right to be informed of their right legal representation and right to free legal assistance contrary to Article 7 (1) (c) of the Charter as read together with Article 14 (3) (d) of the ICCPR. Without minimizing the seriousness of these violation, it is the Court's opinion that the nature of the violations in the particular contexts of this case does not reveal any circumstance which would make their continued imprisonment a miscarriage of justice or arbitrary. Nor have the Applicants demonstrated the existence of other specific or compelling reasons to warrant an order for release. 9S.Accordingly, the Court rejects the Applicant's request to be released from prison IX. COSTS 99. Pursuant to Rule 30 of the Rules "unless otherwise decided by the Court, each party shall bear its own costs." 100. ln their submissions, both parties prayed the Court to order the other to pay costs 101. Based on the foregoing, the Court rules that each party shall bear its own costs X. OPERATIVE PART 102. Forthese reasons The COURT Unanimously, On jurisdiction 24