Q001L8 for lack of a yellow card at a place where the soldiers of the Presidential Guard impounded the vehicle and confiscated it from the police.” . The Applicant alleges that he talked to the President of the Republic who was visiting the population on 8 June 2010, and that in spite of this initiative, the said vehicle was auctioned on 6 April 2011. B. Alleged violations . The Applicant avers that the Respondent State: i. violated his Universal ii. right to property provided Declaration of Human under Articles 17(2) of the Rights (UDHR) and 14 of the Charter; failed in its obligation to provide the requisite remedies pursuant to Article 2(3)(c) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; iii. failed in its obligation to adopt legislative and other measures effect to the international to give instruments ratified, as provided under Article 1 of the Charter; iv. violated his right to work provided under Article 6(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COURT . The Application was filed on 27 February 2017 and served on the Respondent State on 16 March 2017 with the request that it file its Response to the Application within sixty (60) days of receipt of the notice. . On 11 May 2017, the Registry received a letter from the Respondent State reminding the Court of its withdrawal of the declaration made under Article 34 (6) of the Protocol and informing the Court that it would not take part in any proceedings before the Court. It consequently requested the Court to desist from transmitting any information on cases concerning it until it finalises the review of the declaration and communicates its position to the Court.