"1. Pursuant to Article 28 (4) of the Protocol, any party may, for the purpose of executing a judgment, apply to the Court for interpretation of the judgment within twelve months from the date the judgment was delivered unless the Court, in the interest of justice, decides otherwise". 2. The application shall be filed in the Registry. It shall state clearly the point or points in the operative provisions of the judgment on which interpretation is required." 21.lt is clear from these provisions that an Application for interpretation of a Judgment can be declared admissible only when it fulfills three conditions: a) its objective must be to facilitate the execution of the Judgment; b) it must be filed within twelve (12) months following the date of the delivery of the Judgment unless the Court, "in the interest of justice' decides otherwise"; and c) it must clearly state the point or points of the operative provision of the Judgment on which interpretation is required. 22. As regards the purpose of the instant Application, the Court wishes to clarify an aspect of the operative part of the judgment in order to facilitate the execution of the Judgment rendered by the Court on 20 November 2015. 23. The Court notes that the instant Application actually aims to clarify a point in the operative provisions of the Judgment rendered by the Court on 20 November 2015 and thus facilitate its execution. 24. Consequently, it finds that the Application fulfills the first condition provided under Rule 66(1) of the Rules.