14. He also contends that there are various options, either taken alone or in combination, which the United Republic of Tanzania can effect in compliance with the Court's Order to "take all appropriate measures within a reasonable time frame, to remedy all the violations established"; that the United Republic of Tanzania's legislation provides for many possible remedies for wrongfully convicted persons such as himself; that these remedies include, but are not limited to, the following: a) Remission of sentence, provided for under the Penal Code Chapter 16, which at Section 27 (2) provides for the remission of a prison sentence in respect of which the United Republic of Tanzania could have filed an application at the Court of Appeal for the remission of the Applicant's thirty (30) years prison sentence. b) Outright or conditional discharge provided for under Section 38 of the Penal Code which confers powers on the Court which convicted an offender to order his absolute or conditional discharge, provided that the offender does not commit another offence during the period of conditional discharge, and such period must not exceed 12 months. In this regard, since the Applicant has served twenty (20) years of his thirty (30) years' sentence and considering the favourable Judgment of this Court and his conduct during his imprisonment, the United Republic of Tanzania could have taken this measure. c) Presidential pardon, provided for under Section 45 of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, pursuant to which . . . the President of the United Republic of Tanzania may grant pardon, , . . with or without condition, to any person convicted of an offence by a court. 5