25 GROPPERA RADIO AG AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND JUDGMENT They did not maintain this complaint in the subsequent proceedings before the Commission, however, nor did they pursue it before the Court; there is no need for the Court to consider the issue of its own motion. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1. Dismisses unanimously the Government’s preliminary objection; 2. Holds by sixteen votes to three that there has been no breach of Article 10 (art. 10); 3. Holds unanimously that there is no need to consider the case under Article 13 (art. 13). Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 28 March 1990. Rolv RYSSDAL President Marc-André EISSEN Registrar In accordance with Article 51 § 2 (art. 51-2) of the Convention and Rule 52 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this judgment: (a) concurring opinion of Judge Matscher; (b) concurring opinion of Judge Pinheiro Farinha; (c) dissenting opinion of Judge Pettiti; (d) dissenting opinion of Judge Bernhardt; (e) dissenting opinion of Judge De Meyer; (f) concurring opinion of Judge Valticos. R.R. M.-A.E.