22 ALTUĞ TANER AKÇAM v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 102. The Court observes that the applicant has not submitted any evidence to enable the Court to assess and calculate the damage suffered by him; it therefore rejects this claim. 103. As regards the applicant’s claim for non-pecuniary damage, the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in the circumstances of the present case. 104. As to the legal costs and expenses, in the absence of any quantified claim, the Court makes no award. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1. Joins to the merits the Government’s objection concerning the applicant’s victim status and dismisses it; 2. Declares the complaint under Article 10 admissible and the remainder of the application inadmissible; 3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention; 4. Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in the circumstances of the present case. 5. Dismisses the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 October 2011, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Stanley Naismith Registrar Françoise Tulkens President