43 SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1. Holds that, in the event of the Secretary of State’s decision to extradite the applicant to the United States of America being implemented, there would be a violation of Article 3 (art. 3); 2. Holds that, in the same event, there would be no violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) (art. 6-3-c); 3. Holds that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) (art. 6-1, art. 6-3-d); 4. Holds that there is no violation of Article 13 (art. 13); 5. Holds that the United Kingdom is to pay to the applicant, in respect of legal costs and expenses, the sum of £26,752.80 (twenty-six thousand seven hundred and fifty-two pounds sterling and eighty pence) and 5,030.60 FF (five thousand and thirty French francs and sixty centimes), together with any value-added tax that may be chargeable; 6. Rejects the remainder of the claim for just satisfaction. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 7 July 1989. Rolv RYSSDAL President For the Registrar Herbert PETZOLD Deputy Registrar In accordance with Article 51 § 2 (art. 51-2) of the Convention and Rule 52 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the separate opinion of Judge De Meyer is annexed to the present judgment. R.R. H.P.