20 O’HALLORAN AND FRANCIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT C. Article 6 § 2 of the Convention 64. The applicants referred to Article 6 § 2 of the Convention and the presumption of innocence in the course of their submissions, but made no separate complaint in respect of the provision. 65. The Court finds that no separate issue arises to be considered under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1. Holds by fifteen votes to two that there has been no violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; 2. Holds unanimously that no separate issue arises under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 29 June 2007. Vincent Berger Jurisconsult Jean-Paul Costa President In accordance with Article 45 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 74 § 2 of the Rules of Court, the following separate opinions are annexed to this judgment: (a) concurring opinion of Judge Borrego Borrego; (b) dissenting opinion of Judge Pavlovschi; (c) dissenting opinion of Judge Myjer. J.-P.C. V.B.