8. The Applicant appealed to the Supreme Court, which was registered in the Court Registry under number RCA0087 / 14 / HC / KIG; on 24 November 2014, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment confirming the judgment of the Court of First Instance on the same grounds. 9. With regard to the house, the Applicant submits that, he had maintained that he had not carried out any repairs in contradiction to the judgment where the, Court concluded advance payment (with regard to the vehicle) that he had made to him by CORAR used the Insurance Company to repair the house, and this violates his right to a fair trial. B. Alleged violations 10. The Applicant contends that the Respondent State is responsible for : violating his right to a fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal to determine his rights and obligations under Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the UDHR”) and Article 14 (1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (hereinafter referred to as “ICCPR’). Failure to ensure that the competent authorities execute the judgment rendered in favour of the Applicant pursuant to Article 2(3)(c) of the ICCPR. Failure to guarantee his right to have his case heard under Article 7(1)(a)(d) of the Charter. Failure to ensure the independence of the judiciary and the availability, establishment and improvement of competent national institutions for the promotion and protection of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Charter and provided for in Article 26 thereof.