the evident willingness and displays the state of Senegal to bring him to trial and apply the new indictments brought into his criminal law, so the Court notes that the Respondent taken as such, the violation is attached to a hypothesis, gives an abstract and not concrete. 51. In this regard, the Court reiterates that the decision Hadidjatou Mani Koraou Cl Niger State to reiterate that it is not competent to examine laws in Abstrato but specific cases of rights violations The Man. It recalls also in the same direction the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Man in the case opposing the Christian Federation of Jehovah's Witnesses to France , where it notes that Article 34 of the European Convention on Human The Man does not permit a "complaining in the abstract of a law by the mere fact that it seems to infringe the Convention "and that it does not suffice for an individual applicant to claim that a law violates his mere existence of the rights it enjoys under the Convention and the law must be applied to his detriment (Stop 10 Kloss and others v. Germany). And gives in principle a breach of human rights is seen at post when the violation has already occurred. 52. However, that ruling has been some mitigation evocation of "quite exceptional circumstances did admit that the risk of a future violation gives an applicant the status of victim of a violation of the Convention" (application No. 282 Noel ou/95 Naru Tauira and 18 Others v. France dec, OR 12/4/1995 83 p.112). The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights is not isolated, cf. Dudgeon v. United Kingdom, October 22, 1989, Soering v. United Kingdom, July 7, 1989). For in such a situation the applicant may claim a victim, he must produce reasonable and convincing evidence of the likelihood of achieving a