The Court therefore share the noble objectives contained in the mandate of the African Union and reflects the high adhesion of this Organization to the principles of impunity for serious violations of human rights and the rights of victims. However, the Court noted that the implementation of the mandate of the African Union should follow the international practice which has become customary in such situations courts to create ad 'hoc or special. The phrase ".. .. jurisdiction " contained in this term means nothing other than the establishment of a judicial ad 'hoc creation and powers find their low relief in the provisions of Article 15. 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and that Senegal is responsible for proposing the principal forms and modalities of implementation of such a structure. Thus, any company in Senegal outside such a framework would violate, firstly, the principle of non-retroactivity of criminal law, as enshrined in international human rights as an inalienable right and other hand, would obstruct the principle of impunity by the same dedicated international texts. For these reasons 59. The Court:  Considering the revised ECOWAS Treaty of 24 July 1993  Considering the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948  Considering the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights of 27 June 1981  Having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966  Given the ECOWAS Supplementary Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance,  Considering the Protocol of 1999 and the Additional Protocol of 2005 relating to the Court of Justice of the ECOWAS Community,