provided in Article 34 (6) of the Article. It has therefore directed the Registry to inform you that it does not have jurisdiction to deal with your application”,’ Applications filed against the Republic of Congo'® and Lesotho'' were disposed of in the same manner. 15. 1 would like to note that none of the abovementioned “matters” was registered in the General List of the Court. 16. I wish to further note that the judicial determination by the Court of Mr. Falana’s request, filed against an entity which can in any manner whatsoever be brought before the Court, markedly departs from the administrative action decided by the Court, during its 38" Ordinary Session, in the case of Mr. Faustin Uwintije against Rwanda which State is moreover Party to the Protocol and has made the optional declaration recognizing as compulsory the Court’s jurisdiction to deal with cases filed by individuals or non-governmental organizations, as provided by Article 34 (6) of the Protocol, This Application, registered in the General List of the Court, was indeed rejected by way of a simple letter from the Registrar to the Applicant,'* whereas the Court has manifestly jurisdiction ratione personae considered whether it was well-founded. to deal with it and has actually ° Letter from the Registrar dated 14 April 2015 (Ref AFCHPR/Reg,/04/007) in reply to the Application filed by Mr. Mustapha Nasri against the Republic of Tunisia, dated 18 September 2014. '° Letter from the Registrar dated 22 September 2015 (Ref AFCHPR/Reg./09/016) in response to the Application filed by Mr, Jean-Claude Mbango and Others against the Republic of Congo, dated 7 September 2015; in that letter, the Registrar states inter alia as follows: “the Republic of Congo not having made the declaration, the Court does not have the jurisdiction to receive your appeal”, ' Application filed by Mr. Rammutla against Lesotho, dated 25 May 2015, and rejected by letter from the Registrar dated 29 June 2015 (Ref AFCHPR/Reg,./06/013): “/ would like to inform you that although the Kingdom of Lesotho has ratified the Protocol establishing the Court, it has not made the declaration under Article 34 (6) thereof, and as such the Court does not have jurisdiction to receive Applications directly from against the Kingdom of Lesotho". individuals and NGOs ' This letter is mainly worded as follows: “/ write to inform you that at its 38" Ordinary Session held from 31 August to 18 September 2015, the Court considered the above Application and instructed the Registrar to inform you that the said Application does not meet the requirements under Rule 34 of the Rules of Court, and as such it cannot be entertained by the Court. can be addressed. 1 hope you will be able to find another forum where your complaint