parade; and to have his alibi defense given serious consideration by the Respondent State's Police and Judicial Authorities; ( ... ) (xii) Orders the Respondent State to take all appropriate measures within a reasonable time frame to remedy all violations established, excluding a reopening of the trial, and to inform the Court of the measure so taken within six (6) months from the date of this Judgment ( ... )" 8. Referring to Rule 66(1) of the Rules, the United Republic of Tanzania avers that it is encountering difficulties in the implementation of the Judgment due to varied interpretations by the actors involved in the administration of criminal justice at the national level, who are required to implement the Judgment. 9. Consequently, it prays the Court to provide it with clarifications on the meaning of the expression "all appropriate measures" used in point xii of the operative provisions of the Judgment, adding that the interpretation of the said terms will enable it to take tangible and definitive action. 1O. The United Republic of Tanzania also seeks to understand what the Court means by the expression "remedy all violations established" given, it emphasizes, that the acts concerned have already been carried out. III. OBSERVATIONS OF MR. MOHAMED ABUBAKARI 11. Mohamed Abubakari first indicates that the Application for interpretation seems to have been filed within the time frame prescribed under Rule 66 of the Rules; that, however, the time frame under the said Rule 66 cannot be interpreted in isolation; and that the other measures in the operative provisions of the Court's Judgment of 3 June 2016 must be taken, in consideration of the clause which enjoins the United Republic of Tanzania to notify the Court of the measures taken to remedy the violations established within six (6) months following the date of the Judgment.