Supplementary Protocol of the Court is an exception to the general rule. k; this Court observed in Moukhtari Bello versus Jigawa State and others suit No. ECWjCCJjAJ>P/02.!l1 that while International customary Law is les generale the provisions of the Protocol as amended Supplementary applies Protocol is lex specialis and therefore as an exception postulated by the the lex specialis to the generale. We find the observation by this Court in the above stated case, worthy of application herein and adopt same. 32. The provision of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights with incorporating Remedies the international is a general customary of local Rule on exhaustion rule. This Court has stated in numerous authorities that individuals are at liberty to choose wherever they elect to file their causes or matters pertaining to violations of their human rights once the matters imbibed the international law or community texts therein. 33. The defendants ' counsel further raised the question court is competent to act as an appellate of whether this court over the order of detention made by a competent court to wit, the Yaba Magistrate Court. 34· This Court had observed several times in decisions that it does not compose itself as an appellate Court over the decisions of the National Courts as emphasized Republic of Mali - in the case of Moussa Leo Keita versus the ECWjCCJjJUD/03!07 and reported in 2004- 2oo9CC.JELR 63 where the question was asked whether the court can reexamine decisions ;:('!~las reported made by the courts of Member States? This lt~ rt on page 75 that' However, the Court rather deduces from the decision made by the Supreme Court of Mali that, what we have at hand is a case of damages suffered by the Applicant regards his artefacts and for which he was granted reparation. as it The :.2