20 LETELLIER v. FRANCE JUDGMENT non-pecuniary damage, the Court considers that the present judgment constitutes sufficient reparation. B. Costs and expenses 63. For the costs and expenses referable to the proceedings before the Convention institutions, Mrs Letellier claimed 21,433 francs. 64. The Government did not express an opinion on this issue. The Delegate of the Commission left the quantum to be determined by the Court. 65. The amount claimed corresponds to the criteria laid down by the Court in its case-law and it accordingly considers it equitable to allow the applicant’s claims under this head in their entirety. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 (art. 5-3); 2. Holds that there has been no violation of Article 5 § 4 (art. 5-4); 3. Holds that the respondent State is to pay to the applicant, in respect of costs and expenses, 21,433 (twenty-one thousand four hundred and thirty-three) French francs; 4. Dismisses the remainder of the claim for just satisfaction. Done in English and in French, and delivered at a public hearing in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 26 June 1991. Rolv RYSSDAL President Marc-André EISSEN Registrar