17. Rule 113 provides that when a deadline is fixed for a particular submission, either party may apply to the Commission for extension of the period stipulated. The Commission may grant an extension of time for a period not longer than one (1) month. 18. In this case, the Complainant was requested to present evidence and arguments on the admissibility of the Communication within two (2) months from the date of notification of the seizure decision which had expired on 15 January 2017. However, the Complainant did not present a dence and arguments within the stipulated time. 19. To date, the Complainant has not, - submissions, (ii) luding the last ae, ) responded to several correspon ‘or an ex' ension of time has received the ds that the Complainant has nication? its. 594/15: Mohammed Ramadan Mahm Egyp ommunicati ation 387/10: ofi ce, including Communication id Fayad Allah v. the Arab Republic of Yamagnane v. The Republic of Togo, which f diligent prosecution. 22. In view of the above, the Commission decides to strike out the Communication for lack of diligent prosecution. Done at the 234 Extra-Ordinary Session of the Commission held in Banjul, The Gambia from 13 to 22 February 2018 ffean y pis qf hRIAT is [oN w”\\