period of time to dispose of Appeals filed in the Court of Appeal, with a view to delaying exhaustion of local remedies. 31. The Complainant contends that local remedies are therefore "unavailable, insufficient or not effective at all and cannot be accessed freely without coming into contact with artificial impediments, hindrances and hurdles ... impeding tools and roadblocks'<. 32. The Complainant further submits that the ruling of the Vetting of Judges and Magistrates Board of Kenya (Vetting Board) of 25 April 2012;" constitutes an express and unequivocal official public admission on the part of the Respondent State herein to the effect that local judicial remedies are either unavailable, insufficient or are not effectively accessible at all to your humble petitioner and his clientele without coming face toface with artificial impediments unlawfully erected on the way by agents of the Respondent State to impede or delay access to justice'» 33. The Complainant avers that the decision of the Vetting Board has been rendered final by a decision of the Supreme Court in Judges & Magistrates Vetting Board and others v Centre for Human Rights and Democracy and others (Petition No.13A, 14, 15 (2013), thereby proving the unavailability and ineffectiveness of local remedies. 34. The Complainant contends that in many of his cases, judges have recused themselves deliberately to prolong and delay the process or dismissed his cases without delving into the merits. He submits that judges have failed to guarantee his right to fair trial, and that this has led to a breakdown in respect and trust between the judiciary and himself. The Complainant further contends that complaints against the judiciary, which he has submitted on several occasions to bodies such as the Judicial Service Commission, Office of the Chief Justice, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights and Law Society of Kenya have been treated with" disdain, suspicion and contempt ... dismissed or refused without conducting thorough investigations or inquiries">. 35. Accordingly, the Complainant submits that local remedies have been exhausted as per Article 56(5) of the African Charter. Respondent State's Submission on Admissibility 36. 3 Admissibility Submission, page 2 submission Page 3. 4 As above. 5 Admissibility 7