obligations under the Charter; the Protocol 1969 Vienna Convention; (iv) Where the First Instance Division erred in law when it refused to award costs against the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th Respondents; and (v) Whether the Appellant is entitled to the remedies sought. 14. In course of the Scheduling Conference, the prayer against the 4th Respondent was abandoned by the Appellant. II. BACKGROUND 15. The brief background to this Appeal is set out in paragraphs 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Judgment of the First Instance Division, dated 29th November 2013. Those paragraphs recounts the facts as follows:i. THAT the Republics of Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda and Burundi are all signatories to the Charter and the Protocol. ii. THAT Article 34 (6) of the Protocol provides as follows:“At the time of the ratification of this Protocol or any time thereafter, the State shall make a declaration accepting the competence of the Court to receive cases under Article 5(3) of this Protocol. The Court shall not receive any petition under Article 5(3) involving a State Party which has not made such a declaration.” 5

اختر الفقرة المستهدفة3