The Applicant on the Right to know the terms of engagement averred that upon their reinstatement into the Armed Forces of Nigeria, they were neither given a letter of re-instatement nor were they informed about their condition of work. This was not rebutted by the Respondent. Facts that are usually not denied by parties to an action are deemed to have been admitted. On this note the right for the Applicants to know the terms of their engagement was breached and subsequently violated. Right to receive equal remuneration On the issue of Right to receive equal remuneration for equal work done the Applicants averred that they were not receiving salary for a period of seven months and also their allowances were paid for this period. Of equal strength is the allegation that the Applicants’ were dismissed without them being paid their allowances and salaries for a period of seven months and without end of service benefits. The Respondent did not rebut this averment anywhere in his defense. During cross examination of the Applicants’ witness, where the Respondent had the opportunity to rebut this allegation he also failed to so. Therefore the facts as alleged are deemed to have been admitted. To this end deprivation of the Applicants’ to earn salaries and allowances in respect of work they have so far done amounts to a breach on their right to receive equal remuneration for work done and such breach will constitute a violation. Right to work in conducive environment The Applicants further to their averments, claim that during the period of their work they were denied communication with their families and that the working environment was not conducive. This also was not denied by the Respondent which also constitutes an admission and violation of the right to work in a conducive environment. On the totality of the evidences so far adduced by the Applicants including the testimony of Applicants’ witness before the Court during examination-in-chief and cross-examination by the Respondent Counsel, the allegation remain unrebutted and as such confirmed to be credible and admitted. The Court notes that any failure for any party engaged in employment to enforce any one of the above stated rights can constitute a breach and therefore an act of violation of such rights. The Court observes that the Applicants in their initial application 11