52 MORICE v. FRANCE JUDGMENT 183. The Court further finds that the applicant clearly sustained nonpecuniary damage on account of his criminal conviction and, ruling on an equitable basis, it awards him EUR 15,000 on that basis. B. Costs and expenses 184. The applicant claimed EUR 26,718.80 in respect of costs and expenses for the proceedings before the Court. 185. The Government made no comment on this claim before the Grand Chamber. 186. The Court reiterates that costs and expenses will not be awarded under Article 41 unless it is established that they were actually incurred, were necessarily incurred and were also reasonable as to quantum (see, among many other authorities, Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31107/96, § 54, ECHR 2000-XI; Beyeler v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 33202/96, § 27, 28 May 2002; and Kurić and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, ECHR 2014). 187. In the present case, taking account of the documents in its possession and the above-mentioned criteria, the Grand Chamber finds it reasonable to award EUR 14,400 on that basis to the applicant. C. Default interest 188. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, 1. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; 2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention; 3. Holds (a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months, the following amounts: (i) EUR 4,270 (four thousand two hundred and seventy euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of pecuniary damage; (ii) EUR 15,000 (fifteen thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;