6 Commission, the representatives of the alleged victim, and the State, since all the parties had been given the same time limit. 24. On July 15, 2003, the representatives of the alleged victim presented final written arguments and, the following day, they added 14 attachments with 32 documents6. In this brief, they alleged, for the first time, that Article 19 of the Convention had been violated to the detriment of the son, and nephew and niece of Maritza Urrutia, and presented new petitions regarding reparations. On July 17, 2003, the Commission presented final written arguments. The State did not present a brief with final arguments. 25. On August 11, 2003, on the instructions of the President and in accordance with Article 44(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the Secretariat requested the Commission, the representatives of the alleged victim, and the State to provide additional helpful evidence concerning the minimum salary in force in Guatemala and the exchange rate. It also requested the Commission and the representatives to provide a certified document confirming the occupation or profession of Maritza Urrutia. On September 5, 2003, the Secretariat, on the instructions of the President, also requested the State, in accordance with this Article, to forward the “history” of the minimum salary of a teacher as evidence to help it reach its decision. 26. On August 21 and 26, 2003, the representatives of the alleged victim forwarded the documentation requested as helpful evidence7. On September 8 and 11, 2003, the Commission sent the documentation on the exchange rate and the minimum salary8. The State did not present the requested evidence. 27. On October 6 and 8, 2003, on the instructions of the President and in accordance with Article 44(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the Secretariat requested the Commission, the representatives of the alleged victim, and the State to provide further helpful evidence. This consisted in: a copy of the proceedings relating to the writ of habeas corpus filed in favor of Maritza Urrutia, a copy of the administrative and judicial measures initiated by the Guatemalan authorities, and information on the allocated or average salary of a teacher, of a professor at a teacher training school, and of a university professor. On October 31 and November 4, 2003, the representatives of the alleged victim forwarded some of the requested documents9. On October 31, 2003, the Commission presented the copy of the writ of habeas corpus presented by the Guatemalan Archdiocesan Human Rights Office in favor of Maritza Urrutia10. The State did not present the requested evidence. 6 Cf. Attachments A to N and N-0 to N-18 to the final arguments, presented by the representatives of the alleged victim on July 16, 2003 (folios 170 to 248 of the file of the attachments to the brief with final arguments of the representatives of the alleged victim). 7 Cf. Folios 325 to 333 and 337 to 425 of Tome II of the file on merits and possible reparations. 8 Cf. Folios 433 to 440 of Tome II of the file on merits and folios 444 to 534 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations. 9 Cf. Folios 555 to 559 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations and folios 570 to 584 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations. 10 Cf. Folios 563 to 564 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations.