004094 of SOLEIL FM radio station. He submits in conclusion that he has direct interest in all the companies in which he is majority shareholder. 51 . He also submits that it is on the basis of that capacity that he has pleaded economic damages resulting from the Respondent State's determination to really ostracise him and to ruin him economically. *** 52. The Court notes that its personal jurisdiction covers locus standi, which is the legal title under which a person is vested with the power to submit a dispute to a court". 53. In this respect, the Court recalls that it has already held that: "...as a human and peoples' rights court, it can make a determination only on violations of the rights of natural persons and groups mentioned in Article 5 of the Protocol , to the exclusion of private or public law entities." 54. In the instant case, the Court notes that the Applicant brought his Application before the Court in his personal capacity and not as a representative of legal entities and that the rights alleged to have been violated are individual rights . It further notes that, despite the fact that the Applicant is a majority shareholder and chief executive officer of companies, his action does not concern the other shareholders nor the business relations that link them, nor any irregularity in the existence or functioning of the said companies. The Applicant's action tends to presume that his rights have been violated and to seek reparation of the consequences thereof or of the direct damage that he might have suffered personally as a result of the said violations. See Dictionary of International Public Law (Dictionnaire de droit international public) , edition Bruyant , Bruxelles 2001. p. 916. 4 Application No. 038/2016. Ruling of 22/3/2018 , Admissib ility, Jean-Claude Roger Gombert v. Republic of Cote d'lvoire, (hereinafter referred to as the "Jean-Claude Roger Gombert v. Republic of Cote d'lvoire JUdgment, Admissibility") § 47. 3 I