00134Il of proceedings in national courts.aa The Applicant however must provide justification for the amounts claimed.a5 144. The Court notes that the Applicants do not provide any evidence in support of their claim for payment of the costs allegedly incurred in the proceedings before domestic courts. Their respective prayers are therefore dismissed. ii. a Non-material loss Loss incurred by the Applicants 145" With respect to damage caused due to loss of social status, and restricted interaction with their family members due to their trial and imprisonment, the court notes that it has not made any finding in this Judgment to the effect that the Applicants' incarceration was unlawful.ao The related claims are therefore baseless and are consequenfly dismissed. 146. The court however notes that it has found the mandatory imposition of the death penalty in violation of Article 4 of the charter. when it comes to reparation of that violation, the questions that arise in the circumstances of the present Application are those of the prejudice caused by the wrongful act and how to assess the quantum thereof. on this issue, the court recalls its earlier cited case-law to the effect that, in respect of human rights violations, moral prejudice is assumed. This notwithstanding, prejudice has to be assessed and quantified even though the court retains discretion in determining the reparation. a See Norbeft Zongo R. l/ftikila v. Tanzania 45 /bd, S 81; and /bld, a6 See Armand Guehi and Others v. Burkina Faso (Reparations), gg 79-93; (Reparations), g 39. $ 40. v. Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), S 179 40 and Reverend Christopher @ v/