0013{0 150. ln view of the above, the Court finds that the Applicants endured moral and psychological suffering and decides to grant them moral damages in the sum of Tanzanian Shillings Four Million (Tsh 4.000.000) each. 151 . Regarding damage caused due to anguish during their trial and imprisonment, the Court finds that the same reasoning applies as for the alleged loss of social status. The related prayer is therefore dismissed. b. Loss incurred 152. by the Applicant's family The Court considers that as it has held in its earlier judgments, indirect victims must prove their relation to the Applicant to be entitled to damages.ae Documents required include birth certificates for children, attestation of paternity or maternity for parents, and marriage certificates for spouses or any equivalent proof.so The Court notes that, in the present case, while the Applicants mention the names of their family members, none of the required pieces of evidence is provided to establish relation. 153. ln any event, the alleged prejudice to the Applicants'family members were as a result of their incarceration, which this Court did not find unlaMul. The prayers are therefore dismissed. B. Non-pecuniary reparations i. 154. Restitution The Applicants pray the Court to quash the conviction, set aside the sentence and order their release. They also pray the Court to order that they should be "restored to the original situation before the violation". ae See A/ex Thomas v. Tanzania Judgment of 04/06/19 (Reparations), gg. a9€0; Mohamed Abubakari v. Tanzania Judgment of04/06/19 (Reparations), SS. 59-64. s0 See A/ex Thomasv. Tanzania (Reparations), 5. 51; Mohamed Abubakari v. Tanzania (Reparations), s 61. 42 4"=