001345 VI An Order for reparations vii. Any other Order or remedy that this Honorable Court may deem fit.' 131. The Applicants further pray the Court to grant compensation to them and their family members for both material and moral prejudice as stated under the section of this Judgment on the prayers of the Parties. 132. The Respondent State prays the Court to dismiss all the prayers made by the Applicants for reparation as they are unjustified and not supported with evidence. 133. The Court considers that, as it has consistently held, for reparations to be granted, the Respondent State should first be internationally responsible of the wrongful act. Second, causation should be established between the wrongful act and the alleged prejudice, Furthermore, and where it is granted, reparation should cover the full damage suffered. Finally, the Applicant bears the onus to justify the claims made.37 134. As this Court has earlier found, the Respondent State violated the Applicants' rights to life and dignity guaranteed under Articles 4 and 5 of the Charter respectively. Based on these findings, the Respondent State's responsibility and causation have been established. The prayers for reparation are therefore being examined against these findings. 37 See Armand Guehiv. Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), S 157. See also, Norbeft Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso ((Reparations) (2015) I ArcLR 258, SS 20-31, Lohe Bsa Konate v. Burkina Faso (Reparations) (2016) 1 AfCLR 346, $$ 52-59; and Reverend Chtistopher R. Mtikila v. Tanzania (Reparations), SS 27-29 37