00t{ 3 0 declare inadmissible the claim for reimbursement of expenses incurred in exile; dismiss allthe prayers for reparation made by the Applicant; as a counterclaim, hold the Applicant liable to pay the sum of one billion five hundred and ninety-five million eight hundred and fifty thousand (1,595,850,000) CFA Francs as damages. 14.The Respondent State also prays the Court to note that, despite the temporary licenses, BENIN OIL SA and WAF ENERGY had not imported any petroleum product; find that PHILIA is not a party to the lawsuit and to dismiss its claim for compensation; dismiss the request for payment of the sum of ten billion (10,000,000,000) CFA francs for additional legal costs; rule that the new submissions of the parties must remain within the ambit of the re-opened pleadings. V. REPARATIONS lS.Article 27(1) of the Protocol provides that "lf the Court finds that there has been violation of a human or peoples' right, it shall make appropriate orders to remedy the violation, including the payment of fair compensation or reparation". 16.The Court recalls its previous Judgments2 in matters of reparation and reiterates that in considering claims for compensation for prejudice resulting from human rights violations, it takes into account the principle that the State recognized as the perpetrator of an internationally wrongful act has the obligation to make full reparation of the consequences in a way that covers all the damage suffered by the victim. 2 Beneficiaies of late Norbeft Zongo, Abdoulaye Nikiema alias Ablass6, Emest Zongo, Btaise ltboudo and Mouvement Burkinabd des Droits de I'Homme et des Peuples v Burkina Faso (Reparation) (2015) 1 AfCLR 2585 20; Lohd /ssa Konat€ v Burkina Faso (Reparation) (2016) 1 AfCLR 346 S 1S.