restricted the liberty of several persons including themselves pursuant to Article 3 of the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation No. 652/2009. 249. Article 3 of the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation No. 652/2009 provides that: Whosoever or a group intending to advance a political, religious or ideological cause by coercing the government, intimidating the public or section of the public, or destabilizing or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional or, economic or social institutions of the country: 3.1/causes a person's death or serious bodily injun); 3.2/creates serious risk to the safety or health of the public or section of the public; 3.3/commits kidnapping or hostage taking; 3.4/causes serious damage to property; 3.5/causes damage to natural resource, enuironmeni, historical or cultural heritages; 3.6/endangers, seizes or puts under control, causes serious interference or disruption of any public service; or 3.7/threatens to commit any of the acts stipulated under sub-articles (1) to (6) of this Article; is punishable with rigorous imprisonment from 15 years to life or with death. 250. The Complainants submitted that law's reference to "causes serious damage to property" and to "public services" under Article 3(6) of the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation No. 652/2009 are equally overboard in terms of their definition of the terms. To the Complainants, this is so because under Article 2(1) of the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation No. 652/2009, "property" is defined as any asset whether corporeal or incorporeal or movable or immovable, and includes deeds and instruments evidencing title to or interest in such asset such as bank accounts", while" public services" is considered to be electronic, information communication, transport, finance, public utility, infrastructure or other similar institutions or systems established to give public service." 1/ /I 251. The Complainants also submitted that the Respondent State had sought to justify its arrest and detention of the Complainants under Articles 4 and 5 of the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation No. 652/2009. Article 4 of the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation No. 652/2009 provides tha t: Whosoever plans, prepares, conspires, incites or attempts to commit any of the terrorist acts stipulated under sub-articles (1) to (6) of Article 3 of this Proclamation is punishable in accordance with the penalty provided for under the same Article. 252. Whereas Article 5 of the Anti-Terrorism Proclamation No. 652/2009 provides that: Whosoever, knowingly or having reason to know that his deed has the effect a {fPportlng, ftT'6) <> '. commission of a terrorist act or a terrorist organization: ~"" «'0':.-'"~ (a) provides, prepares or gives forged-or falsified document; (b) provides a skill, expertise or moral support or gives advice; (c) provides, collects or makes available any property in any manner;